1 |
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:50:56AM -0700, BRM wrote: |
2 |
> Probably, but why would you want to? it fixes any errors, and makes the file |
3 |
> system relatively clean again so that things function well - and things don't |
4 |
> get lost. |
5 |
> If you skip it, you risk data corruption on disk. |
6 |
|
7 |
That misses the point. I have rebooted sometimes just for a quick |
8 |
change, possibly to try a different kernel, and intending to reboot |
9 |
several times. Then whoops! it starts a long fsck scan, not to repair |
10 |
damage, but just because some counter went to zero. What a waste. |
11 |
|
12 |
It's like insisting on an oil change exactly every 3000 miles. No, |
13 |
sorry, I will wait until it is convenient for *me*, not the odometer. |
14 |
|
15 |
So his question is, once the fsck has started, can he ^C to bomb it |
16 |
off, or do anything else to skip what has started? |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._. |
20 |
Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@×××××××.com |
21 |
GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933 |
22 |
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o |