1 |
I am also happy with QEMU. I used for an online game that uses DirectPlay wich is not supported by cedega or wine. Im running WinXPSP2 |
2 |
and it is really stable. |
3 |
|
4 |
The different license for kqemu is no problem. You are free to use it, but if you want to integrate it in a product you want to |
5 |
sell/distribute you have to ask. |
6 |
|
7 |
/Uwe |
8 |
|
9 |
Daniel da Veiga wrote: |
10 |
> On 1/10/06, Tom Smith <tom71713-gentoo52478932@×××××.com> wrote: |
11 |
> |
12 |
>>Hi all, |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>>I've been using Win4Lin TS 3.0 for some time to server Win98SE to five |
15 |
>>remote users for legacy application support. |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>>I'm currently testing the recently released Win4Lin Pro TS server |
18 |
>>running Win2k as an intended replacement for the old TS server. This is |
19 |
>>where I came across QEMU... |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>>QEMU appears to have functionality similar to VMWare (I haven't tried it |
22 |
>>yet). I'm curious to here other Gentoo users' experience with this |
23 |
>>software. I will be using in a production environment so stability and |
24 |
>>uptime are very important, as are reasonable performance. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I used it to run the Office Viewers, hate when you receive a .doc with |
28 |
> strange chars and everything borked, WMP is the only thing that runs |
29 |
> some cranky pieces of video files decently, some sites only work |
30 |
> decently with IE and other apps are still to be correct run under |
31 |
> stuff like wine and such. I have an old license for win98 and so it |
32 |
> was my choice, besides any other would run too slowly because I only |
33 |
> have an Athlon XP 1.6, but it runs flawless for a long time. Instant |
34 |
> boot with the savevm and loadvm commands make it even better than the |
35 |
> real thing :) |
36 |
> |
37 |
> I never had problems, you can install the OS and use the -snapshot |
38 |
> mode to never really "mess" with the original install, and even commit |
39 |
> changes after you feel its safe. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> I must mention that the kqemu kernel module (needed in order to |
42 |
> provide decent speed) has a different license (its proprietary |
43 |
> software), and without it I couldn't stand the wait, so, I use it. I |
44 |
> don't know if it fits your needs and never used it at production |
45 |
> environment, but it is as stable as Win itself (heh), at least for me. |
46 |
> |
47 |
> |
48 |
>>I would very much appreciate any feedback you all can give me about your |
49 |
>>experience with QEMU. |
50 |
>> |
51 |
>>Best Wishes, |
52 |
>> |
53 |
>>Tom |
54 |
>>-- |
55 |
>>gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
56 |
>> |
57 |
>> |
58 |
> |
59 |
> |
60 |
> |
61 |
> -- |
62 |
> Daniel da Veiga |
63 |
> Computer Operator - RS - Brazil |
64 |
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- |
65 |
> Version: 3.1 |
66 |
> GCM/IT/P/O d-? s:- a? C++$ UBLA++ P+ L++ E--- W+++$ N o+ K- w O M- V- |
67 |
> PS PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+++ R+* tv b+ DI+++ D+ G+ e h+ r+ y++ |
68 |
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ |
69 |
> |