Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] no network "eth0" after upgrade.
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 05:37:27
Message-Id: CF9DCF89-BD3A-4EB5-A5B3-B7D7387C564C@antarean.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] no network "eth0" after upgrade. by Philip Webb
1 On 20 December 2015 05:19:13 CET, Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> wrote:
2 >151219 thelma@×××××××××××.com wrote:
3 >> On 12/19/2015 05:56 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
4 >>> On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 19:02:54 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
5 >Thelma> none /proc/bus/usb usbfs defaults,devmode=0666
6 >0 0
7 >> none /proc proc
8 >> defaults 0 0
9 >Neil> You're trying to mount /proc/bus/usb before mounting /proc.
10 >> Systemd takes care of such things,
11 >> but with Openrc local mounts are mounted in the order they appear in
12 >> fstab. Try switching the lines.
13 >Philip> That looks like the explanation to me : has Thelma tried this ?
14 >Neil> Looking at it again, I don't think either of those entries
15 >> should be in fstab, certainly not the /proc one.
16 >Thelma> Good hint, thank you. I've removed both lines from fstab:
17 >> and the system booted normally with openrc-0.18.4
18 >> Question, why isn't 'none /proc proc defaults 0 0' needed anymore ?
19 >> All my other systems have this line in fstab.
20 >
21 >My own Fstab has long had these lines :
22 >
23 > # NB The next line is critical for boot!
24 > none /proc proc defaults 0 0
25 >
26 >When did this change & why ? Does anyone know ?
27
28 It's been deprecated for a while.
29 Not sure when, think it was in a news item.
30
31 It certainly hasn't been in stage3 tarballs for the past 2 years. (Unless it reappeared suddenly)
32 I know this because that's when I installed my laptop and that line never was there.
33
34 --
35 Joost
36 --
37 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] no network "eth0" after upgrade. Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net>