| 1 |
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:42:07 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > I find the separate files much easier to manage as all the settings |
| 4 |
> > for each package are kept separate, and easily removed or changed - |
| 5 |
> > for example when I stop using the package. The alternative would be to |
| 6 |
> > comment every entry in the file so I know why I put it there and |
| 7 |
> > whether I still needed it. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> What I ran into, I'd update say KDE. It would need some packages added |
| 10 |
> to the keyword file. Some may not be KDE but packages that KDE depends |
| 11 |
> on. Well, should those that are KDE go into the KDE file and the ones |
| 12 |
> that are dependencies but not KDE go into a file of its own or what? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
You put them wherever you want! I put them in kde, because that's what |
| 15 |
they are for. That way I know that those entries were required by KDE |
| 16 |
without having to fill the single file with comments. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
O.K. I'm weird, but I'm saving up to become eccentric. |
Archives