1 |
On Sun, March 18, 2012 8:30 am, Michael Mol wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Bruce Hill, Jr. |
3 |
> <daddy@×××××××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> On March 17, 2012 at 8:43 PM Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> <snip> |
10 |
>>> initramfs side of things. I did have to use one to bring up my server |
11 |
>>> with / on a RAID6, not because I needed it long term but in the short |
12 |
>>> term I couldn't determine how mdadm was numbering the RAID so that I |
13 |
>>> could get grub.conf correct. I'm somehow a bot worried something is |
14 |
>>> going to slip by the devs and I'd be better off having an initramfs |
15 |
>>> already running on the box when I do allow the upgrades. |
16 |
>>> |
17 |
>>> Planning on giving Dracut a try. |
18 |
>>> |
19 |
>>> Thanks, |
20 |
>>> Mark |
21 |
>>> |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> |
24 |
>> The real short of this is that if you use 0.90 superblocks, and /boot on |
25 |
>> it's own little partition, your kernel can assembly your |
26 |
>> RAID<whateverlevel> without an initrd image. You will reboot with the |
27 |
>> /dev/md0 you created as /dev/md0. And unless you have partitions (or is |
28 |
>> it |
29 |
>> single drives) over 2TB, you can use metadata=0.90. |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> As they say, Works For Me (R). |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> I've yet to read a simple explanation of HOW-TO do this in a Gentoo doc |
34 |
>> (not that it doesn't exist), but you can follow this very simple |
35 |
>> README_RAID used in Slackware to build them on Gentoo: |
36 |
>> |
37 |
>> http://slackware.oregonstate.edu/slackware64-current/README_RAID.TXT |
38 |
> |
39 |
> I recall reading on this list a week or two ago that kernel |
40 |
> autoassembly of 0.90 arrays was deprecated. :( |
41 |
|
42 |
Shhh! |
43 |
Please don't tell my production server ;) |
44 |
|
45 |
It might go at some point, especially if they decide that everyone uses |
46 |
initramfs or similar... |
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
Joost |