1 |
On 19 December 2006 00:23, Bryan Østergaard wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Gentoo started with the stated goal of providing a metadistribution. |
4 |
> This basically means providing the best possible foundation for others |
5 |
> to tinker with any way they like. Be it building embedded applications, |
6 |
> making the next 'Ubuntu' or whatever. To me the flexibility that Gentoo |
7 |
> provides is one of the most important things. |
8 |
|
9 |
Exactly. Over the last 2 years or so, I have converted most of my customers to |
10 |
Gentoo - and it is a big relief compared to all those commercial |
11 |
distributions. I all ways had to fight their admin tools for any setup that |
12 |
wasn't completely standard. With Gentoo, I can set up systems exactly the way |
13 |
I want them without fighting anything. That's an incredible advantage from a |
14 |
professional sys/net-admin's POV. |
15 |
|
16 |
> And for those who think Gentoo is declining I can only say that's |
17 |
> definitely not what I'm seeing as lead of developer relations and |
18 |
> recruiters. There's always some developers leaving but we have a lot |
19 |
> more developers joining us. In the last 3 years that I've been a Gentoo |
20 |
> developer we've grown from ~80 developers to 330+ developers. That's a |
21 |
> yearly growth of 60% or more. |
22 |
|
23 |
Amen. At last, someone provides numbers instead of speculation. |
24 |
|
25 |
Now, if only open-xchange made the jump from hard masked to unstable. ;-) |
26 |
|
27 |
Uwe |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Mark Twain: I rather decline two drinks than a German adjective. |
31 |
http://www.SysEx.com.na |
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |