1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
James wrote: |
5 |
> kde-meta is ideal for me. I thought it was going away? |
6 |
> Since kde(4)-meta is alive and well, that is my preferred |
7 |
> method. I hope when kde-meta goes away (?) there is a migration |
8 |
> plan? When this whole kde4 venture started for me (feb 09) |
9 |
> I was told to avoid meta as it is going away....... |
10 |
> |
11 |
> [...] |
12 |
> |
13 |
> How long is kde-meta going to be around? |
14 |
> That's really what I'm looking for..... |
15 |
> |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
kde-base/kde*-meta won't be going away any time soon, if at all. The |
19 |
original plan, way back when, was to transition everything to sets, but |
20 |
the current implementation in portage 2.2_rc* does not currently do |
21 |
everything that is needed, so we are recommending the usage of the meta |
22 |
packages. |
23 |
|
24 |
- -- |
25 |
Jonathan Callen |
26 |
Gentoo KDE Developer |
27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
28 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux) |
29 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
30 |
|
31 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkrnym4ACgkQOypDUo0oQOo9ZQCbBwM1fUMQzv+mReF/aaEkr8I7 |
32 |
LLUAmgIaNDiixVl5fd+PQY2OjqMPY1pU |
33 |
=icEh |
34 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |