| 1 |
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:01:08 -0400 |
| 2 |
sean <tech.junk@×××××××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> I was only trying out Amarok. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
What did you think? I thought it was super cool, except it's resource |
| 7 |
utilization is so high i don't run it anymore if I can avoid. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
audacious seems almost completely better to me |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> I suspect they aren't sending the information via icmp, so just the |
| 12 |
> fact that the server is "pingable" really doesn't provide useful |
| 13 |
> information in this particular case. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
yeah, but it is a lot more likely that the server would be down than |
| 16 |
that it's just misconfigured. servers go down all the time; they are |
| 17 |
generally seldom administered. so it seems to me a ping is a good |
| 18 |
first step in testing access to these servers. im guessing CDDB does |
| 19 |
use IP, so if icmp can get through, so can tcp (udp,or any other |
| 20 |
protocols encapsulated in ip). |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives