| 1 |
On 1 Oct 2009, at 19:40, Stroller wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On 1 Oct 2009, at 19:07, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> On Donnerstag 01 Oktober 2009, Arthur D. wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> As the access to the bug was denied by the admin please use this |
| 8 |
>>> link for |
| 9 |
>>> discussion: |
| 10 |
>>> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-795069.html |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> wow, you must have been VERY obnoxious to have the bug closed for |
| 13 |
>> others. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> First time I see that. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I saw the bug earlier, must have been 30 minutes before it was closed. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> It didn't seem "obnoxious" as such, but the dev considered the bug |
| 20 |
> closed and I think it kept getting reopened as others added |
| 21 |
> comments. There was certainly a request in the bug "please do not |
| 22 |
> reopen as I do not want to make this bug devs only" when I saw it, |
| 23 |
> but all was polite. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> This is really a shame, as the discussion there was really more |
| 26 |
> insightful that that here - lots of people here are echoing stuff |
| 27 |
> that was already explained in the bug, and some of what is being |
| 28 |
> echoed here is apparently wrong. It seemed to all be quite clearly |
| 29 |
> explained in the responses to the bug report. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I meant to add, the Google cache seems to be missing most of these |
| 32 |
useful comments. :( |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:Ywvu1cqDSmcJ:bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D286017+gentoo+286017&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk |
| 35 |
or http://preview.tinyurl.com/yborwyw |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Stroller. |
Archives