| 1 |
On Monday, 23 April 2018 18:53:09 BST Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celeron |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > Celeron is a brand name given by Intel to a number of different |
| 6 |
> > low-end IA-32 and x86-64 computer microprocessor models targeted |
| 7 |
> > at budget personal computers. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Looking at that page, "Celeron" can be a cheap, low end version any |
| 10 |
> one of a whole slew of Intel CPUs. You have to check the cpu to get the |
| 11 |
> exact model that it's the low end version of. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
..and it doesn't even mention silvermont. The page is 15 months old since its |
| 14 |
last update, which is about the same age as the box in question. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Anyway, this all leaves unanswered the question whether getting the -march |
| 17 |
setting right in a chroot matters to the operation of the chroot itself, as |
| 18 |
distinct from building good code for the target machine. Personally, I can't |
| 19 |
see how it can have any such effect. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Regards, |
| 23 |
Peter. |
Archives