1 |
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Neil Bothwick<neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:42:11 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
<SNIP> |
5 |
> |
6 |
>> A different short-term solution might be to find another old junker |
7 |
>> machine that is supported, building it out of junker parts. This would |
8 |
>> be good if I had any certainty that when the work was completed |
9 |
>> portage wouldn't immediately create the same havok. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Your real problem is that you are using outdated and unsupported |
12 |
> hardware. Not unsupported by Gentoo but unsupported by ATI. Incidentally, |
13 |
> have you filed a bug report about this, if the only available driver for |
14 |
> your hardware has been removed from portage, you should post a bug asking |
15 |
> it to be reinstated. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> -- |
19 |
> Neil Bothwick |
20 |
> |
21 |
> "I laugh in the face of danger, then I hide until it goes away" |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
Unfortunately for me: |
25 |
|
26 |
1) It absolutely isn't that the hardware is unsupported, it's that a |
27 |
*feature* of the hardware (TV Out S-Video) became unsupported. The |
28 |
machine works (AFAIK) with Gentoo. It boots, it probably runs X just |
29 |
fine using the VGA output. It's that the S-Video output feature (TV |
30 |
Out) has become unsupported by ati-driver. Who would have ever guessed |
31 |
when you purchased a machine that uses and ATI chipset with a built-in |
32 |
ATI graphics controller that it would be ATI that chose to obsolete |
33 |
it? Amazing... |
34 |
|
35 |
2) Following your Bugzilla suggestion about asking that it be put back |
36 |
into portage to it's logical conclusion and it gets scary. Here's the |
37 |
paraphrased request: |
38 |
|
39 |
a) I need ati-driver-8.28.8 put back into portage because it's the |
40 |
last driver that supports TV out for the 9100 IGP chipset. |
41 |
b) Unfortunately I need 2.6.19 added back into portage because it's |
42 |
the last kernel that ati-driver-8.28.8 runs on. |
43 |
c) Because all this old stuff doesn't work on the new xorg-server I |
44 |
need xorg-server-1.1.1 to remain in portage. |
45 |
|
46 |
Multiply this sort of requirement up by whatever additional packages |
47 |
are required to get the stuff above actually working and it looks |
48 |
unlikely, 'eh? Granted, I don't need the kernel because I can just get |
49 |
that and manage it myself. (I.e. - I don't need gentoo-sources) |
50 |
|
51 |
I really think this is what a personal overlay is for, but as I've |
52 |
said for years, it's hard to build an overlay when you don't know what |
53 |
needs to be in it until it's been removed. And yes, *something* has |
54 |
removed these files, at least from my distfiles directory and I'm |
55 |
pretty confident it wasn't me by hand because the machines all have |
56 |
disk space which is the only reason I ever remove packages from there |
57 |
by hand. There are still things lurking around in /var/db/pkgs or |
58 |
whatever it's called so maybe I can learn how to create a personal |
59 |
overlay form what's left and then go look elsewhere for other things |
60 |
required. |
61 |
|
62 |
Anyway, thanks for the inputs. I'm not sure what I'm going to do next |
63 |
other than take some time and figure things out. |
64 |
|
65 |
As always I appreciate your help. |
66 |
|
67 |
Cheers, |
68 |
Mark |