| 1 |
>> Man, rsync is easy to use. I imagined something else. |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Try Bakula with a robotarm tape changer to keep the two things in |
| 4 |
> sync... ;-) |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> Would rsnapshot be useful in this case? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Defacto rsnapshot is just an elaborate wrapper around rsync... |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> What are the advantages of using a daemon instead of remote-shell? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> What daemon? Did I miss something? Be kind: rewind... |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
According to man rsync: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
"There are two different ways for rsync to contact a remote system: |
| 17 |
using a remote-shell program as the transport (such as ssh or rsh) or |
| 18 |
contacting an rsync daemon directly via TCP." |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I'm using remote-shell and I'm wondering what benefit the daemon has. |
| 21 |
I probably wouldn't have to enter the username/password? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
- Grant |
Archives