1 |
Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:26:02 -0600 |
3 |
> Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Howdy, |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> I ran across this and though it was a joke. Did a news search and |
8 |
>> sure enough, it is reported in lots of places. Random linky: |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2102856/Will-FBI-shut-Internet-March-8-virus-concerns.html?ito=feeds-newsxml |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> Is there any truth to this mess? My bigger and better question, how |
13 |
>> is shutting down the internet going to fix this? When the net comes |
14 |
>> back up, they are still going to be infected. Right? |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> I'm glad I run a really nice Linux OS. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Gawd, I hate it when morons write sensational articles that attempt to |
20 |
> make sense to other morons. You get crap like that. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> So if this is legit, and I'm not saying it is, what happened is this: |
23 |
> |
24 |
> The malware changes the DNS cache settings on infected machines, |
25 |
> sending the user to rogue caches. The FBI captured some (or all) of |
26 |
> these rogue caches and (possibly) tried to fix them. A court has now |
27 |
> said those rogue caches must now be shut down. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> So if the morons reading the article do nothing, on March 8 the DNS |
30 |
> caches they use will be down. The user's DNS will not work. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> OMFG!!!!!!! Da intartubes is broken!!!!! |
33 |
> |
34 |
> <sigh> |
35 |
> |
36 |
> Instead, why not just set the DNS caches to something NOT owned by Ivan |
37 |
> The Russian Spammer? |
38 |
> |
39 |
> And no, the intartubes will NOT be switched off. |
40 |
> |
41 |
|
42 |
I don't really think they can unless they just cut power to all the |
43 |
computers. After all, the internet is supposed to be redundant right? |
44 |
If there is a few computers still running that have a connection, it is |
45 |
still working. Sort of anyway. |
46 |
|
47 |
Does make one wonder tho. They have been talking about having a |
48 |
internet "off switch" but I'm not sure it would be that easy. |
49 |
|
50 |
Dale |
51 |
|
52 |
:-) :-) |
53 |
|
54 |
-- |
55 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
56 |
how you interpreted my words! |
57 |
|
58 |
Miss the compile output? Hint: |
59 |
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |