Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] bindmount or symlink?
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:00:42
Message-Id: 20120313125845.5a236baf@khamul.example.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] bindmount or symlink? by Pandu Poluan
1 On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:05:59 +0700
2 Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote:
3
4 > On Mar 13, 2012 2:00 PM, "Alan McKinnon" <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
5 > wrote:
6 > >
7 > > On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:04:00 +0700
8 > > Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote:
9 > >
10 > > > I am seriously thinking of splitting the storage of directories
11 > > > under /usr, e.g., /usr/portage and /usr/source actually living
12 > > > somewhere else, on different partition and different filesystem.
13 > > > Let's say something mounted on /mnt/Persistent.
14 > > >
15 > > > My question: should I use bindmount or symlinks to do that?
16 > > > What's the drawbacks/benefits for either?
17 > > >
18 > > > Rgds,
19 > >
20 > > You should do neither as they do not give you split storage, they
21 > > both give you the same thing in two different places.
22 > >
23 > > Create two new filesystems and mount them.
24 > >
25 > > I personally use /var/portage as there is no good reason for it to
26 > > be under /usr where it is just clutter.
27 > >
28 > > Code goes in /usr
29 > > Data goes in /var
30 > >
31 > > You have to change PORTDIR in /etc/make.conf for this to work as
32 > > well as /etc/make.profile. Nothing breaks without it, you just get
33 > > errors from portage
34 > >
35 >
36 > Eh? But I put portage, src, share, etc. on a different partition
37 > mounted under /mnt ... doesn't that mean I am using a split
38 > filesystem?
39
40 Do you have separate filesystems for each of those directories, or one
41 big storage area? I'm struggling to find out what you are trying to
42 accomplish and what problem that is a solution for.
43
44
45 --
46 Alan McKinnnon
47 alan.mckinnon@×××××.com