| 1 |
On Mar 13, 2012 2:00 PM, "Alan McKinnon" <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:04:00 +0700 |
| 4 |
> Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > I am seriously thinking of splitting the storage of directories |
| 7 |
> > under /usr, e.g., /usr/portage and /usr/source actually living |
| 8 |
> > somewhere else, on different partition and different filesystem. |
| 9 |
> > Let's say something mounted on /mnt/Persistent. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > My question: should I use bindmount or symlinks to do that? What's the |
| 12 |
> > drawbacks/benefits for either? |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Rgds, |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> You should do neither as they do not give you split storage, they |
| 17 |
> both give you the same thing in two different places. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Create two new filesystems and mount them. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I personally use /var/portage as there is no good reason for it to be |
| 22 |
> under /usr where it is just clutter. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Code goes in /usr |
| 25 |
> Data goes in /var |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> You have to change PORTDIR in /etc/make.conf for this to work as well |
| 28 |
> as /etc/make.profile. Nothing breaks without it, you just get errors |
| 29 |
> from portage |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Eh? But I put portage, src, share, etc. on a different partition mounted |
| 33 |
under /mnt ... doesn't that mean I am using a split filesystem? |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Rgds, |
Archives