Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Cc: pandu@××××××.info
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] bindmount or symlink?
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:02:02
Message-Id: 20120313085938.5b359cfd@khamul.example.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] bindmount or symlink? by Pandu Poluan
1 On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:04:00 +0700
2 Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote:
3
4 > I am seriously thinking of splitting the storage of directories
5 > under /usr, e.g., /usr/portage and /usr/source actually living
6 > somewhere else, on different partition and different filesystem.
7 > Let's say something mounted on /mnt/Persistent.
8 >
9 > My question: should I use bindmount or symlinks to do that? What's the
10 > drawbacks/benefits for either?
11 >
12 > Rgds,
13
14 You should do neither as they do not give you split storage, they
15 both give you the same thing in two different places.
16
17 Create two new filesystems and mount them.
18
19 I personally use /var/portage as there is no good reason for it to be
20 under /usr where it is just clutter.
21
22 Code goes in /usr
23 Data goes in /var
24
25 You have to change PORTDIR in /etc/make.conf for this to work as well
26 as /etc/make.profile. Nothing breaks without it, you just get errors
27 from portage
28
29
30 --
31 Alan McKinnnon
32 alan.mckinnon@×××××.com

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] bindmount or symlink? Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info>