| 1 |
Am Sat, 19 Nov 2016 17:15:27 -0500 |
| 2 |
schrieb Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Tom H <tomh0665@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Miroslav Rovis |
| 6 |
> > <miro.rovis@××××××××××××××.hr> wrote: |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> >> Ah, I almost forgot. Gentoo is as default (OpenRC) without dbus! |
| 9 |
> >> Have a look: |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> >> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Comparison_of_init_systems |
| 12 |
> >> |
| 13 |
> >> There is no D-Bus under "Main dependencies" for OpenRC (I really |
| 14 |
> >> like OpenRC...) |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > There's no reason that the fact that OpenRC doesn't depend on dbus |
| 17 |
> > should imply that something higher up the stack cannot depend on |
| 18 |
> > dbus! |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I'd also comment that utilizing dbus and spawning random processes |
| 21 |
> that you don't understand are orthogonal issues. Dbus is just an IPC |
| 22 |
> mechanism. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
It's actually not dbus' fault that at-spi2 is launched... It's just a |
| 25 |
side-effect of at-spi2 being an IPC built ontop of dbus. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
What I don't like is that at-spi2 launches it's own dbus instance. Why |
| 28 |
not just join the bus that's already there? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Regards, |
| 32 |
Kai |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Replies to list-only preferred. |
Archives