1 |
on Tuesday 04/29/2008 Alan McKinnon(alan.mckinnon@×××××.com) wrote |
2 |
> On Tuesday 29 April 2008, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote: |
3 |
> > > This kind of gratuitous change is bullshit and *really* ticks me |
4 |
> > > off as useful important stuff just *goes away* |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > I don't want to comment about the change. However, you could have |
7 |
> > found out easily all the available profiles by doing "eselect profile |
8 |
> > list": |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > # eselect profile list |
11 |
> > Available profile symlink targets: |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Fair enough, except that I maintain make.profile manually using ln. Same |
14 |
> with /usr/src/linux. And I've been doing that since my first install |
15 |
> and have never needed to look for a front end tool that can replace one |
16 |
> simple command with one simple command. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> In fact, I didn't even know about this feature of eselect till 5 minutes |
19 |
> ago. So now there are two useful and important things that were not |
20 |
> communicated to users. |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
OK, what will I gain if I change the profile from |
24 |
/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2006.1/desktop to |
25 |
/usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2007.0 (I don't even have a |
26 |
2008.0 -- maybe I need to sync)? Will it unmaks useful packages or |
27 |
someting? |
28 |
|
29 |
Thanks. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
33 |
How do |
34 |
you spend it? |
35 |
|
36 |
John Covici |
37 |
covici@××××××××××.com |
38 |
-- |
39 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |