1 |
Hello all, |
2 |
|
3 |
Sorry if it seems like this is a repeat question, but I've gone through |
4 |
my Gentoo list for the past 2 years and none of the answers provided for |
5 |
previous threads on this seem to work for me. Here's the situation: |
6 |
|
7 |
Gentoo box: |
8 |
AMD Athlon X2 3800+ |
9 |
Intel PCIe Gigabit Network adapter |
10 |
01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82572EI Gigabit Ethernet |
11 |
Controller (Copper) (rev 06) |
12 |
Supermicro 8-port PCI-X SATA card (in a PCI slot) |
13 |
03:06.0 SCSI storage controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. |
14 |
MV88SX6081 8-port SATA II PCI-X Controller (rev 09) |
15 |
Western Digital 1TB Black Edition hard drive (writing to an XFS partition) |
16 |
2.6.27-amd64 (Yes, it's old, it's on my list to upgrade) |
17 |
|
18 |
Client: |
19 |
MacBook Pro |
20 |
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.26Ghz |
21 |
Intel integrated Gigabit Network adapter |
22 |
Seagate 160GB SATA hard drive (5400RPM) |
23 |
Mac OS X 10.6.1 |
24 |
|
25 |
/etc/exports: |
26 |
/mnt/daigo 192.168.0.31(rw,insecure) |
27 |
|
28 |
hdparm -tT /dev/sdf |
29 |
|
30 |
/dev/sdf: |
31 |
Timing cached reads: 1230 MB in 2.00 seconds = 614.64 MB/sec |
32 |
Timing buffered disk reads: 316 MB in 3.01 seconds = 104.95 MB/sec |
33 |
|
34 |
Over NFS I'm getting 3.7MB/s, with occasional bursts of 25MB/s for 1-5 |
35 |
seconds, then returning to 3.7MB/s. During this entire process, the |
36 |
system load is hovering around 5.5. |
37 |
|
38 |
The same copy, using samba to share that partition, I get 45MB/s |
39 |
sustained. System load is around 1.0. |
40 |
|
41 |
Even though the SATA controller is over the PCI bus, which does limit |
42 |
its performance somewhat (no RAID arrays are running on it) as you can |
43 |
see from the attached hdparm output, the disk is capable of speeds that |
44 |
should be around what gigabit ethernet can provide. |
45 |
|
46 |
I know this is a Gentoo list, and not generally the place to complain |
47 |
about poor NFS performance in Mac OS X, we all know Gentoo is superior |
48 |
in just about every way anyway. However, I simply cannot believe that |
49 |
the difference in transfer speeds is due to strictly to Mac OS X's NFS |
50 |
capabilities. |
51 |
|
52 |
Does anyone have any suggestions for reducing the system load caused by |
53 |
NFS? Can you suggest any performance increasing tips for my NFS |
54 |
configuration? |
55 |
|
56 |
Thanks, |
57 |
Hal |