| 1 |
On Monday 16 Jan 2012 01:35:04 Pandu Poluan wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Jan 16, 2012 12:58 AM, "Walter Dnes" <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:30:03AM -0500, Tanstaafl wrote |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > > This is nothing like changing the port for SSH - a port scanner can |
| 6 |
> > > figure that one out in seconds... |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > A real BOFH would set up a dummy instance of sshd on the regular port, |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > as well as a real sshd instance on another port. The dummy instance |
| 11 |
> > could be set up to always fail the login attempt, and with special |
| 12 |
> > iptable rules to not clutter up your logfile. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> And don't forget to put the false sshd through a tc rule that chokes the |
| 15 |
> return traffic to 1 cps B-) |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Of course, being the "real sysadmin" a.k.a lazy slob that I am, that's way |
| 18 |
> too much work for not enough bastardly pleasure... I can't gleefully see |
| 19 |
> the face of people trapped in the tc hell :-P |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Can you set up tc by port? I thought it is only applicable to an interface. |
| 23 |
I need to brush up on this one day. |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Regards, |
| 26 |
Mick |
Archives