| 1 |
On Monday 07 December 2009 22:14:55 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 23:10:18 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 3 |
> > The only benefit, which is questionable, is that python-3 is where its |
| 4 |
> > at development-wise, and maybe perhaps the 2* series will become |
| 5 |
> > unmaintained (shades of KDE-3). But I suspect that day is still far off. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Also, as things are able to make use of Python 3, it will be there. But |
| 8 |
> that doesn't warrant a "highly recommended", if anything needs it, |
| 9 |
> portage will install it anyway. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
There's another wrinkle, too. I did follow the recommendation and install |
| 12 |
Python 3, but what will happen when my current 2.6.4 is upgraded to, say, |
| 13 |
2.7.0 and I want to run python-updater? Will I find myself updated to version |
| 14 |
3 instead? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Maybe I should just remove Python 3 pro tem. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Rgds |
| 20 |
Peter |
Archives