Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Why exactly am I supposed to install Python 3? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:15:17 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20091207221455.1df8f43a@digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Why exactly am I supposed to install Python 3? by Alan McKinnon |
||
| 1 | On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 23:10:18 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > The only benefit, which is questionable, is that python-3 is where its |
| 4 | > at development-wise, and maybe perhaps the 2* series will become |
| 5 | > unmaintained (shades of KDE-3). But I suspect that day is still far off. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Also, as things are able to make use of Python 3, it will be there. But |
| 8 | that doesn't warrant a "highly recommended", if anything needs it, |
| 9 | portage will install it anyway. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Neil Bothwick |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Crime doesn't pay? Does that mean my job is illegal? |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Why exactly am I supposed to install Python 3? | Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××××.org> |