1 |
lordsauronthegreat@×××××.com wrote: |
2 |
> On Sunday 30 April 2006 08:47 am, Alexander Skwar wrote: |
3 |
>> wu chuanwen wrote: |
4 |
>> > 2006/4/30, Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name |
5 |
>> > <mailto:listen@×××××××××××××××.name>>: |
6 |
>> > |
7 |
>> > Hm, those are not firefox USE flags. What do you get, when |
8 |
>> > you run |
9 |
>> > |
10 |
>> > emerge -vpt mozilla-firefox |
11 |
>> > |
12 |
>> > |
13 |
>> > I get this: |
14 |
>> > [ebuild U ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.2 [1.5.0.1-r4] |
15 |
>> > USE="gnome ipv6 -debug -java -mozdevelop -xinerama -xprint" 37 kB |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> Do you really need ipv6? I doubt that this has anything to |
18 |
>> do with the problem at hand, but if you don't need it, you |
19 |
>> should remove it. If you don't know anything about ipv6, |
20 |
>> it's very probable that you don't need it. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> IPV6 is a protocol |
23 |
|
24 |
Yep. |
25 |
|
26 |
> that is (AFAIK) just a layer below TCP/IP. |
27 |
|
28 |
Wrong. Besides: "just a layer below TCP/IP" makes no sense. |
29 |
TCP/IP is a protocol family. Two of those members are IPv4 |
30 |
and IPv6. Now, what's "just a layer below TCP/IP" supposed |
31 |
to mean? |
32 |
|
33 |
> I wouldn't |
34 |
> remove it if I were you. |
35 |
|
36 |
Why not? Why leave in things, which are not needed and which |
37 |
are known to possibly cause problems? |
38 |
|
39 |
>> Try a blank Firefox profile. To create one, run "firefox -ProfileManager". |
40 |
> |
41 |
> I don't see how that would help anything. |
42 |
|
43 |
It would help, if the problem is on his side, caused by bad |
44 |
settings in his profile. If everything's faster with a blank |
45 |
profile, he knows for sure, that the problems were caused |
46 |
by his old profile. |
47 |
|
48 |
Alexander Skwar |
49 |
-- |
50 |
It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees. |
51 |
-- |
52 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |