1 |
On 11/18/18 12:19 PM, james wrote: |
2 |
> On 11/17/18 9:59 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: |
3 |
>> On 2018-11-18, james <garftd@×××××××.net> wrote: |
4 |
>>> On 11/17/18 6:51 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: |
5 |
>>>> On 2018-11-17, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
>>>>> On Saturday, 17 November 2018 23:00:22 GMT Grant Edwards wrote: |
7 |
>>>>>> On 2018-11-17, james <garftd@×××××××.net> wrote: |
8 |
>>>>>> |
9 |
>>>>>>> Actually and AMD Arm (64bit) Ryzen or newer. |
10 |
>>>>>> |
11 |
>>>>>> No, Ryzen is not an Arm processor. |
12 |
>>>> |
13 |
>>>>> Well, ... the PSP spy-in-the-die is an ARM core running within the |
14 |
>>>>> main AMD x86 CPU and you can't switch it off, or remove it. |
15 |
>>>> |
16 |
>>>> Right. Unless AMD has screwed up royally, the ARM |
17 |
>>>> security-processor-thingy is pretty much invisible to the end-user. |
18 |
>>>> |
19 |
>>>>> However, I'm sure this is not the kind of ARM James' been looking |
20 |
>>>>> for. |
21 |
>>>> |
22 |
>>>> I assumed not. |
23 |
>>>> |
24 |
>>>> I'd love to have an Arm based laptop, but getting full-up Linux |
25 |
>>>> running reliably on a Chromebook is just a bit over my hassle budget. |
26 |
>>>> I also want it to have a 16" 4:3 150dpi display, an RJ45 Ethernet |
27 |
>>>> connector, and a real DB9 serial port. I'll pass on the built in POTS |
28 |
>>>> modem... |
29 |
>>> |
30 |
>>> I had not realized that AMD has completely given up on Arm Systems. |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>> It's hard to tell. They still show the Opteron-A on their web site, |
33 |
>> but Google couldn't find anything using it... |
34 |
>> |
35 |
>>> I'm looking for an arm64 system, with enough native power to compile 64 |
36 |
>>> bit arm codes, natively. Here is the best I've found:: |
37 |
>>> |
38 |
>>> SynQuacer Dev Box |
39 |
>>> |
40 |
>>> [1] https://www.96boards.org/product/developerbox/ |
41 |
>>> |
42 |
>>> Purports to run gentoo (embedded?). |
43 |
>>> "�SC2A11� is a multi-core chip with 24 cores of ARM� Cortex-A53" |
44 |
>>> |
45 |
>>> Not quite available (alpha) and a bit pricey at $1200.00. |
46 |
>> |
47 |
>> Ouch. |
48 |
>> |
49 |
>>> Like Grant I'm looking for an arm 64 system that is straightforward |
50 |
>>> on installing gentoo, and has enough resources to perform most |
51 |
>>> compiles, natively. Or somebody has distcc running on four of those |
52 |
>>> 4G DDR-4 boards. |
53 |
>>> |
54 |
>>> Perhaps a gentoo cluster running on the latest R. PI ? |
55 |
>>> |
56 |
>>> Perhaps Vapier has a hidden howto to put native gentoo on Chromebooks? |
57 |
>> |
58 |
>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Chromebook |
59 |
>> |
60 |
>> It's definitly doable ( for certain models and some value of |
61 |
>> "doable"). Everytime I look into it, the models for which "real" |
62 |
>> Linux installations are documented are always out-of-production. |
63 |
>> |
64 |
>>> Perhaps "TomH" has some suggestions. I got one of those "hikey Armv8a" |
65 |
>>> boards from 2015, but cannot find his gentoo image he crafted and |
66 |
>>> published. I do not have time for another gentoo adventure, just want to |
67 |
>>> use it and sync it now and again and install ebuilds and write a few |
68 |
>>> ebuilds for some 64 bit arm boards. |
69 |
>> |
70 |
>> Cross development might be easier. It's how a _lot_ of ARM Linux |
71 |
>> targets are supported. Even if the devlopment host and target are |
72 |
>> both ARM64, unless they're _really_ identical (same kernel, distro, |
73 |
>> and libraries), you still end up doing a good amount of "cross" |
74 |
>> compiling. |
75 |
>> |
76 |
>>> My thoughts are to consolidate my efforts into one (arm64) arch, both on |
77 |
>>> the development lappy and the arm64 SBCs I have to code to and |
78 |
>>> maintain. Perhaps All winner? (Allwinner H6)?USB 3.0 is great for SSD |
79 |
>>> and offgrid applications. |
80 |
>> |
81 |
> |
82 |
> |
83 |
> So, I'm going with a standard:: |
84 |
> |
85 |
> |
86 |
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Raspberry_Pi_3_64_bit_Install |
87 |
> |
88 |
> I guess I'll try to cluster these guys, say four, into an old laptop |
89 |
> with a removed motherboard, and just cable the connections, to the |
90 |
> external sides of the old/large motherboard. It'll be interested to see |
91 |
> if I can get the 17.3 inch screen to work with this board. You'd think |
92 |
> that some laptop case manufacturer would have already built a generic |
93 |
> laptop to house 4-8 of these R.pi.3B+ boards inside and prebuilt cables |
94 |
> to tether to glueable connectors on the outside of the case. I like the |
95 |
> Molex-screw-terminals myself, particularly for RS232 serial and A/D IO. |
96 |
> USB and HDMI out to be easy to extend. |
97 |
> |
98 |
> And you thought those old (large) laptops were still useless.... |
99 |
> |
100 |
> Wish me luck. Drop a line if you find gentoo-clusterd on these R. |
101 |
> Pi-3B+ SBC anywhere. Surely today's kids do that sort of thing between |
102 |
> classes? |
103 |
> |
104 |
> It'd be great if we made this laptop to clusters (gentoo) Rpi a group |
105 |
> project... I might just look for a 'carrier-slot' hardware, where R.pi |
106 |
> can be inserted and removed kinda like the old pcmcia cards on lappies. |
107 |
> |
108 |
> Thx Grant (&Mick), |
109 |
> |
110 |
> James |
111 |
|
112 |
Found a RPiB3+ lappy kit:: |
113 |
|
114 |
|
115 |
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/pi-top-review-a-raspberry-pi-laptop-for-tinkering-on-the-go/ |
116 |
|
117 |
Now just add a carrier board for (4-8) RPiB3+ and cluster them together. |
118 |
Several web sites indicate that distcc can be use to compile native code |
119 |
for these Broadcom based arm64 systems:: |
120 |
|
121 |
from :: |
122 |
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Raspberry_Pi#WiFi |
123 |
|
124 |
"The project's GitHub page additionally contains instructions for |
125 |
setting up crossdev and distcc to build for the 64-bit RPi3. " |