| 1 |
On Sunday 16 November 2008 11:04:41 William Kenworthy wrote: |
| 2 |
> dirvish is in portage. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> tar/rsync/cp are not really backups but manual copies. If you want true |
| 5 |
> backup you need scripts to handle the extra functionality for things |
| 6 |
> like versioning, archive management and the all important restore. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Dirvish is excellent on all but restore. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Which raises the question: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
What's the point of it then? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
OTOH, it has to be better than legato. Nothing could be worse than legato. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives