1 |
It actually does a very fast, space efficient backup management. |
2 |
|
3 |
As for restore, each backup is effectively an uncompressed fully |
4 |
accessible mirror image so you can manually copy/tar/... etc back for |
5 |
the full system, or individual files. The developers basically say we |
6 |
have a working backup system where you can restore using standard tools |
7 |
if needed, but we'll make it easier when we can get around to it. |
8 |
|
9 |
Having versioned backups can be REALLY handy at times. Space efficiency |
10 |
typically stabilises at 2x archive size depending on delta. |
11 |
|
12 |
Downside it can hammer a disk - reiserfs is fine but ext2/3 was flaky. |
13 |
|
14 |
moriah ~ # esearch dirvish |
15 |
[ Results for search key : dirvish ] |
16 |
[ Applications found : 1 ] |
17 |
|
18 |
* app-backup/dirvish |
19 |
Latest version available: 1.2.1 |
20 |
Latest version installed: 1.2.1 |
21 |
Size of downloaded files: [no/bad digest] |
22 |
Homepage: http://www.dirvish.org/ |
23 |
Description: Dirvish is a fast, disk based, rotating network |
24 |
backup system. |
25 |
License: OSL-2.0 |
26 |
|
27 |
Its worth a read on how its done - using smarts rather than brute force! |
28 |
|
29 |
BillK |
30 |
|
31 |
On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 11:58 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
32 |
> On Sunday 16 November 2008 11:04:41 William Kenworthy wrote: |
33 |
> > dirvish is in portage. |
34 |
> > |
35 |
> > tar/rsync/cp are not really backups but manual copies. If you want true |
36 |
> > backup you need scripts to handle the extra functionality for things |
37 |
> > like versioning, archive management and the all important restore. |
38 |
> > |
39 |
> > Dirvish is excellent on all but restore. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Which raises the question: |
42 |
> |
43 |
> What's the point of it then? |
44 |
> |
45 |
> OTOH, it has to be better than legato. Nothing could be worse than legato. |
46 |
> |
47 |
> |
48 |
-- |
49 |
William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au> |
50 |
Home in Perth! |