| 1 |
A tad off-topic, but John, why don't you setup a mailing list and have the |
| 2 |
PTA members join? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 9/23/05, John Jolet <john@×××××.net> wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> On Sep 23, 2005, at 3:31 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> > On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 22:38:07 -0400, Sean Lester wrote: |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> >> That's it. I didn't think the ISP would block outgoing port 25. |
| 13 |
> >> |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > Unfortunately, quite a lot seem to do it. it's a lazy and lame |
| 16 |
> > "solution" |
| 17 |
> > to spam trojans. Other ISPs forward all port 25 connections to |
| 18 |
> > their own |
| 19 |
> > SMTP server, so your mail may not be delivered directly, but it is |
| 20 |
> > delivered. |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > Even if port 25 isn't blocked or redirected, it is often worth |
| 23 |
> > using your |
| 24 |
> > ISP's relay even if you have a broadband connection. Some ISP's block |
| 25 |
> > incoming mail from IP ranges allocated to broadband users as an |
| 26 |
> > anti-spam |
| 27 |
> > measure. |
| 28 |
> > |
| 29 |
> one unfortunately corollary to this is my isp doesn't block outgoing |
| 30 |
> port 25, but DOES limit the number of emails you send via their |
| 31 |
> relay. I send a newsletter for my kids' school's pta and I could not |
| 32 |
> do that if I couldn't send at least a chunk of them directly. |
| 33 |
> -- |
| 34 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
- Mark Shields |
Archives