Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Taiidan@×××.com" <Taiidan@×××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory?
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 12:05:11
Message-Id: 6cb25230-9803-2bd4-ee69-66504d0d1822@gmx.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory? by Mick
1 On 12/09/2017 05:45 AM, Mick wrote:
2 > On Saturday, 9 December 2017 10:34:32 GMT Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
3 >> On 09/12/17 11:51, Mick wrote:
4 >>> I've seen gnome-base/gnome-common pulled in on more than one systems, all
5 >>> of>
6 >>> which have USE="-gnome" set:
7 >>> # emerge -uaNDvt world
8 >>>
9 >>> These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
10 >>> [...]
11 >>> Calculating dependencies... done!
12 >>> [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-common-3.18.0-r1:3::gentoo
13 >>> USE="autoconf-archive" 153 KiB
14 >>> [...]
15 >>>
16 >>> All systems are on profile: default/linux/amd64/17.0/desktop/plasma
17 >>>
18 >>> Why is gnome-base/gnome-common needed?
19 >> It's an extremely lightweight package. There seem to be some packages
20 >> that need files from it. The package itself only installs these files:
21 >>
22 >> $ qlist gnome-common
23 >> /usr/bin/gnome-autogen.sh
24 >> /usr/share/aclocal/gnome-common.m4
25 >> /usr/share/aclocal/gnome-compiler-flags.m4
26 >> /usr/share/aclocal/gnome-code-coverage.m4
27 >> /usr/share/doc/gnome-common-3.18.0-r1/ChangeLog.bz2
28 >> /usr/share/doc/gnome-common-3.18.0-r1/README.bz2
29 >>
30 >> So basically it only copies some small text files to /usr. It doesn't
31 >> build anything.
32 > Thank you all for detailed and clear replies. You'd forgive me for being (a
33 > little) paranoid about Poettering's fingers getting anywhere near my systems.
34 > :-p
35 >
36 For now, only a few text files - tomorrow - many more.
37
38 You give poettering an inch he will take hundred miles.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory? Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>