Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory?
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:45:57
Message-Id: 2343494.DDJaQvByiF@dell_xps
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory? by Nikos Chantziaras
1 On Saturday, 9 December 2017 10:34:32 GMT Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
2 > On 09/12/17 11:51, Mick wrote:
3 > > I've seen gnome-base/gnome-common pulled in on more than one systems, all
4 > > of>
5 > > which have USE="-gnome" set:
6 > > # emerge -uaNDvt world
7 > >
8 > > These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
9 > > [...]
10 > > Calculating dependencies... done!
11 > > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-common-3.18.0-r1:3::gentoo
12 > > USE="autoconf-archive" 153 KiB
13 > > [...]
14 > >
15 > > All systems are on profile: default/linux/amd64/17.0/desktop/plasma
16 > >
17 > > Why is gnome-base/gnome-common needed?
18 >
19 > It's an extremely lightweight package. There seem to be some packages
20 > that need files from it. The package itself only installs these files:
21 >
22 > $ qlist gnome-common
23 > /usr/bin/gnome-autogen.sh
24 > /usr/share/aclocal/gnome-common.m4
25 > /usr/share/aclocal/gnome-compiler-flags.m4
26 > /usr/share/aclocal/gnome-code-coverage.m4
27 > /usr/share/doc/gnome-common-3.18.0-r1/ChangeLog.bz2
28 > /usr/share/doc/gnome-common-3.18.0-r1/README.bz2
29 >
30 > So basically it only copies some small text files to /usr. It doesn't
31 > build anything.
32
33 Thank you all for detailed and clear replies. You'd forgive me for being (a
34 little) paranoid about Poettering's fingers getting anywhere near my systems.
35 :-p
36
37 --
38 Regards,
39 Mick

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory? Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory? "Taiidan@×××.com" <Taiidan@×××.com>