1 |
Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> My first -m state rule is, |
4 |
> iptables -A INPUT -p ALL -m state \ |
5 |
> --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT |
6 |
|
7 |
That was mine, too (you can omit -p in this case, can't you?). |
8 |
|
9 |
> And if what you say is true, I'd be in deep shit if it reset to, |
10 |
> iptables -A INPUT -p ALL -m state -j ACCEPT |
11 |
> without a warning. |
12 |
|
13 |
It *was* resetted here. I just noticed it reading this discussion. |
14 |
|
15 |
Don't exactly know what the "stateless" rule did (perhaps just |
16 |
nothing?), but since I didn't notice it for a pretty long time, |
17 |
it can't have been all to bad?! At least, it didn't crash the |
18 |
whole system :-) |
19 |
|
20 |
But I would have appreciated at least an update notice, too! |
21 |
|
22 |
-Matt |