1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
It is possible today. When testing a new application, I will often install |
4 |
it in my own account. What you're looking for is the "--prefix" argument to |
5 |
"./configure". For example, "./configure --prefix=$HOME" will install the |
6 |
app in question into ~/bin, ~/lib, ~/share, etc. |
7 |
|
8 |
dcm |
9 |
|
10 |
On 2/18/06, Rafael Fernández López <info@××××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Hi, |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Since I have started a project that needs to be redistributed |
15 |
> (it'll be GPL) |
16 |
> I've started to deeply read Autoconf and Automake manuals. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Well, I had read some of FHS too, to know what I should do and |
19 |
> what I should |
20 |
> not do with my file hierarchy. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> But, what came to my mind (maybe it's possible today) is that we |
23 |
> could make a |
24 |
> new "file system" subtree in every ~. For example, a user will be able to |
25 |
> do |
26 |
> a "./configure ; make" but if the system is well-administrated a user |
27 |
> won't |
28 |
> be able to run a "make install", since it can cause problems to the |
29 |
> system. |
30 |
> (I know we, Gentoo users, don't care about that). But what I wanted to say |
31 |
> is |
32 |
> that if we are not root (typical case) we could do a "./configure ; make ; |
33 |
> make install" (in an app called 'whatever') and it could create for |
34 |
> example |
35 |
> "/home/me/bin/whatever" and "/home/me/share/doc/whatever" or |
36 |
> "/home/me/doc/whatever", and so on. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> That would be great since a normal user won't infect any root |
39 |
> filesystem, and |
40 |
> an administrator can fix any tricky problem deleting "/home/me". |
41 |
> |
42 |
> Bye and thanks !, |
43 |
> Rafael Fernández López. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> |
46 |
> |