| 1 |
On 15/06/2014 16:48, Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 6/14/2014 7:08 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> The answer is *always" in the ebuild and Changelog. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I agree that, now that I know what and why, that it didn't rate a news |
| 6 |
> item, but - especially with respect to anything related to the touchy |
| 7 |
> subject of systemd/openrc - some kind of informational text explaining |
| 8 |
> the change in the postinst text of the installation (I always read these |
| 9 |
> emails when performing updates, even for non critical packages) is |
| 10 |
> warranted (imnsho)... |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
You used the word "touchy", and that is the lynch factor here. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
People are touchy about systemd, making the entire thing a |
| 19 |
political/social argument and not a technical one. The tree is a 100% |
| 20 |
technical creation and social/political factors do not feature. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Nothing broke and you were not required to make a decision. Hence no |
| 23 |
news needed. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 29 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives