1 |
On 23/04/2013 23:10, Jarry wrote: |
2 |
> On 23-Apr-13 22:40, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> ext4 is fine. All the horror stories ended years ago and almost all |
5 |
>> major distros ship it as a default. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Hm, I remember one horror story about "ext4 data corruption bug" |
8 |
> which circulated in public just a few months ago: |
9 |
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/23/690 |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Jarry |
12 |
|
13 |
I dimly recall that one. Didn't it happen only in some very obscure |
14 |
circumstances that rarely happens in real life? Like rapidly mounting |
15 |
and unmounting the filesystem in a very specific use-scenario? |
16 |
|
17 |
What I do recall clearly is my conclusion at the time that the bug was |
18 |
just that - a bug. All software has bugs and not all bugs are equal; one |
19 |
has to learn to categorize them, and this one was relatively minor as |
20 |
far as filesystem bugs go. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Alan McKinnon |
24 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |