| 1 |
Well, that would certainly help to trace the problem with pulseaudio, yes. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
But I must admit that I'm hoping someone here has a more pleasant |
| 4 |
suggestion. Something like a magical solution or that obvious shot I'd |
| 5 |
never think about =) |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Anyway, I don't believe that it's really a pulseaudio bug, so I'm |
| 8 |
afraid to file a bug for it, but I'm beggining to change my mind =( |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Ophidian <ophidian@×××××××××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 11 |
> Gustavo Campos wrote: |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> > My point is: |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > Is there any way to tell pulseaudio not to eat my cpu that much? |
| 16 |
> > Or better: Is there a solution that would allow me to be a happy child |
| 17 |
> > without having to use pulseaudio and it's extra layer between me and |
| 18 |
> > my beloved hardware? |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > You guys can't imagine how much I played with google and alsa without |
| 21 |
> > solution before I surrended to pulseaudio. If you show me a better |
| 22 |
> > solution I'll feel myself stupid, but happy. |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> You might get your best results if you email Lennart and/or open a ticket |
| 26 |
> at http://pulseaudio.org/ |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Aaron |
| 29 |
> -- |
| 30 |
> "The goblins are in charge of maintenance? Why not just set it on fire now |
| 31 |
> and call it a day?" |
| 32 |
> --Whip Tongue, Viashino Technician |
| 33 |
> -- |
| 34 |
> gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
Gustavo Campos |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Ciência da Computação / Computer Science - UFMG |
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives