Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Upside/downside to including config files in quickpkg?
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:11:59
Message-Id: 4B74B8CC.5010301@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Upside/downside to including config files in quickpkg? by Mark Knecht
1 chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
2 > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
3 > <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote:
4 >
5 >> On Freitag 12 Februar 2010, Dale wrote:
6 >>
7 > <SNIP>
8 >
9 >>> This is how I understand it. If you use buildpkg with emerge, you get
10 >>> the original configs from the source tarball. If you use quickpkg, then
11 >>> you get the config files YOU created. If I understand this correctly,
12 >>> you can remember it this way as well. Doing it during the emerge gives
13 >>> you what emerge produces. Doing it with quickpkg gives you what you
14 >>> produced.
15 >>>
16 >>> All that and I didn't confuse myself. So, I'm probably wrong in how I
17 >>> understand it. lol
18 >>>
19 >>> Dale
20 >>>
21 >>> :-) :-)
22 >>>
23 >> no, this is entirely correct.
24 >>
25 >>
26 >>
27 > > From what I've seen last night and today I do not think this is correct.
28 >
29 > quickpkg =NAME
30 >
31 > produces a binary package with NO config files included.
32 >
33 > You have to use
34 >
35 > quickpkg --include-configs =NAME
36 >
37 > to get the configs, at least from what I can see from the messages it
38 > produces when it runs.
39 >
40 > There is another option to limit the configs to only the unedited ones.
41 >
42 > - Mark
43 >
44 >
45
46 You do have to add that option but that was already mentioned. I should
47 have added it for clarity tho.
48
49 Dale
50
51 :-) :-)