1 |
Pandu Poluan wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Indeed! Especially control freaks like me :-) |
5 |
> |
6 |
> But seriously, I personally found Gentoo to be the most logical Linux |
7 |
> distro. Yes, the initial barrier (installation) is daunting, so to |
8 |
> speak, but after doing it successfully, one can immediately intuit |
9 |
> "what's going on". Installing and configuring other packages becomes |
10 |
> piece of cake. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> The logical way of Gentoo even extends to its packages. For instance, |
13 |
> packages that are meant to be run as services/daemons will *certainly* |
14 |
> have a pair of files in conf.d and init.d. Customizable environs are |
15 |
> in env.d and profile.d. And so on. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I've used Linux exclusively as servers, and I have dabbled with Red |
18 |
> Hat, CentOS, Ubuntu, Debian, and Arch, but Gentoo wins hands down for |
19 |
> its logicality. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Not to mention that I can customize my servers exactly to my |
22 |
> specifications, instead of having to put up with cruft that the distro |
23 |
> maintainer feel as a "must have". Case in point : how many distros |
24 |
> allow you to choose which cron daemon you want to use? |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Another plus point is the almost complete devel tools provided out of |
27 |
> the box: the gcc suite. Now if I happen across an open source project |
28 |
> that hasn't made it yet to the portage tree, I can just download and |
29 |
> compile it myself. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Related to that, is the great job Portage did regarding dependency |
32 |
> hell. Since I am no longer hostage to the whims of the distro |
33 |
> maintainer re: versions of libraries installed, if a program needs a |
34 |
> library that's newer than the current 'stable' version, I can just |
35 |
> keyword the needed version and compile away. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Rgds, |
38 |
> |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
This is true but the OP may not really need this type of control. Most |
42 |
people, newcomers especially, just want something that is easy and sort |
43 |
of learn a bit and see if Linux is for them. Some people just aren't |
44 |
wanting to be geeky at all. They want a OS that will take care of |
45 |
everything for them. In that case, Gentoo is not going to be worth the |
46 |
effort. |
47 |
|
48 |
Me, I have a Desktop with no real special needs. I just wanted to be |
49 |
able to learn about Linux, not have some bunch of junk that I never ever |
50 |
intend to use installed and be able to update without standing on my |
51 |
head with my small toe up one nostril trying to jump hoops. Mandrake |
52 |
had a horrible update process and I got tired of it quick. If you could |
53 |
insert CD, install and not need to update anything, then you were good |
54 |
to go. If you install and then need to update something, oooops. Flip |
55 |
upside down and assume the position. |
56 |
|
57 |
Gentoo does have a lot of good points, especially for me. It is just |
58 |
not going to be easy and hand holding at first for a newcomer. The OP |
59 |
will learn a lot and as I pointed out, it can be addicting. Just turn |
60 |
off the quiet output setting and see what Linux is really all about. ;-) |
61 |
|
62 |
Dale |
63 |
|
64 |
:-) :-) |
65 |
|
66 |
-- |
67 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |