1 |
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:44 AM, <meino.cramer@×××.de> wrote: |
5 |
>>>> Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> [12-04-08 18:40]: |
6 |
|
7 |
[snip] |
8 |
|
9 |
>>>> Status quo: System with ext4 and no extended attributes. |
10 |
>>>> Where I want to be: The same system with extended attributes. |
11 |
>>>> |
12 |
>>>> Way to go: No reformatting and mkfs and all that things. Only kernel |
13 |
>>>> reconfiguring / recompiling / rebooting and emerging some tools. |
14 |
>>>> |
15 |
>>>> Possible? |
16 |
>>> |
17 |
>>> As others had said, this is possible. I used this guide: |
18 |
>>> |
19 |
>>> http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/643 |
20 |
>>> |
21 |
>>> You need basically to enable the ext4-only features: |
22 |
>>> |
23 |
>>> tune2fs -O extents,uninit_bg,dir_index <partition> |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> Um, why? Ext3 had extended attribute support, and ISTR the ext4 code |
26 |
>> being able to handle ext3 filesystems. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Didn't we already had this discussion? You can mount an ext3 partition |
29 |
> as ext4, and it will be treated as ext4, but it will keep bein fully |
30 |
> backwards compatible with ext3 (i.e., you can still mount it as ext3). |
31 |
> This, however, negates the purpose of using ext4, as you are not using |
32 |
> extents: |
33 |
|
34 |
Sure, ext4 is a better filesystem than ext3. I'm not disputing that. |
35 |
I'm disputing that. I'm disputing two things: |
36 |
|
37 |
1) That you need to convert a filesystem to ext4 in order to use |
38 |
extended attributes. |
39 |
2) That you need to convert the filesystem at all; Meino's 'status |
40 |
quo' filesystem is already ext4, per the portion of his email I |
41 |
quoted. |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
:wq |