| 1 |
On 21 February 2010 14:03, Volker Armin Hemmann |
| 2 |
<volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Sonntag 21 Februar 2010, Mick wrote: |
| 4 |
>> I know that some of you have been using reiser4 for some years now. |
| 5 |
>> How does it compare in performance and reliability in terms to |
| 6 |
>> reiserfs and xfs? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
> they don't even come close in performance. XFS sucks with files who are not |
| 9 |
> multi megabyte in size. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>> A few years ago I remember there were problems compiling or running |
| 12 |
>> some applications/libraries on reiser4 - are these problems now over? |
| 13 |
>> Any gotchas? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> a loooong time ago there was a bug when compiling kde and without compression. |
| 16 |
> Fixed shortly afterwards, never had a problem again. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Thanks Volker for a prompt reply. Is reiser4 still being developed, |
| 19 |
or is Linux now moving towards ext4? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Some googling has shown me that reiser4 gives better performance than |
| 22 |
ext4, although not across the board. |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Regards, |
| 25 |
Mick |
Archives