1 |
2013/3/15 Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Friday 15 Mar 2013 01:18:03 Francisco Ares wrote: |
4 |
> > Hello. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > During some months now, this machine was (and still is, sometimes) |
7 |
> > suffering from a strange progressive lock down. It always has begun with |
8 |
> > the web browser, passing to the whole X environment, and finally I could |
9 |
> > not even use a console. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > After several trial and error actions, as no log entry could give any |
12 |
> hint |
13 |
> > on what is going on, it seems that I found something consistent. |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > This machine is a dual-boot Linux/Windows, as my wife once in a while |
16 |
> needs |
17 |
> > to work on a Windows O.S. . The lock down starts when she saves a file |
18 |
> > received by e-mail in a ntfs-3g mounted partition, so that file would |
19 |
> also |
20 |
> > be accessible whenever she uses Windows. |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > The reason why I suspect of ntfs-3g is that when the lock down starts, |
23 |
> that |
24 |
> > is, if only the web browser locks, just unmounting (and mounting back |
25 |
> > later) that partition, recovers the web browser functionality. Sometimes, |
26 |
> > when the lock down has already affected the whole graphic environment, |
27 |
> but |
28 |
> > I still may use a console, again unmounting that same partition also |
29 |
> > unlocks everithing. |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> > I have already tried to emerge ntfs-3g with different use flags, but the |
32 |
> > problem persists. Even built a new kernel and re-emerged ntfs-3g after |
33 |
> > that. Now ntfs-3g package is using its own "fuse". |
34 |
> > |
35 |
> > I would really appreciate any hints on what to do or where to look for |
36 |
> any |
37 |
> > more information on this subject. Perhaps I am still looking at an |
38 |
> effect, |
39 |
> > and not the cause. |
40 |
> > |
41 |
> > Thanks |
42 |
> > Francisco |
43 |
> |
44 |
> It could be a number of things, but would start with the basics, checking |
45 |
> that |
46 |
> there is adequate space in the partition and that the fs has been |
47 |
> defragmented |
48 |
> (Windows 7 defrag application is quite effective and for WinXP there is |
49 |
> mydefrag). While you have booted into MSWindows, you might as well run |
50 |
> chkdsk. |
51 |
> |
52 |
> Other than that, uou could try the 'big_writes' mount option in ntfs-3g |
53 |
> which may make a difference. |
54 |
> -- |
55 |
> Regards, |
56 |
> Mick |
57 |
> |
58 |
|
59 |
|
60 |
I didn't try to defragment that partition, yet. I can't believe that |
61 |
ntfs-3g would not take care of fragmentation, but I will do a defrag just |
62 |
in case ;-) |
63 |
|
64 |
Will try that "big_writes" too. |
65 |
|
66 |
Thanks |
67 |
Francisco |
68 |
-- |
69 |
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples then you |
70 |
and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have |
71 |
one idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas." |
72 |
- George Bernard Shaw |