1 |
On 2013-08-19 4:54 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On 19/08/2013 18:39, Tanstaafl wrote: |
3 |
>> On 2013-08-19 9:36 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>>> For your other question, you don't need an initramfs if your /usr is not |
5 |
>>> split off and drivers for your fs on / and chipset are compiled in. That |
6 |
>>> will stay true for ages to come (until some joker starts shipping kernel |
7 |
>>> drivers in /var....) |
8 |
|
9 |
>> Right, but that wasn't my question, my question was will I be able to |
10 |
>> continue using eudev (or mdev, or whatever)... |
11 |
|
12 |
> Surely that depends on how well-maintained eudev remains in the future? |
13 |
> And is therefore best answered by the package maintainers? |
14 |
|
15 |
You misunderstand. |
16 |
|
17 |
I'm concerned about feature/dependency creep, where all of a sudden the |
18 |
Gentoo Council makes a decision (or is forced into a decision) that |
19 |
makes it *impossible* for eudev (or any alternative) to work without |
20 |
systemd. |
21 |
|
22 |
Or even worse, I actually had a dream (nightmare?) last night about an |
23 |
email to the list that went something like: |
24 |
|
25 |
"Announcement: The Gentoo Council, in its infinite wisdom, has decided |
26 |
to make Fedora Core the official upstream for Gentoo. This is being done |
27 |
to make all of our lives easier, and so that we can all have GNOME on |
28 |
the desktop." |
29 |
|
30 |
<shudder> |