| 1 |
On 19/08/2013 18:39, Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2013-08-19 9:36 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> For me, I'm not opposed to merging /usr. I'm not opposed to other people |
| 4 |
>> using systemd, I am opposed to*me* using it. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Agreed, and that is precisely the concern here... |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> For your other question, you don't need an initramfs if your /usr is not |
| 9 |
>> split off and drivers for your fs on / and chipset are compiled in. That |
| 10 |
>> will stay true for ages to come (until some joker starts shipping kernel |
| 11 |
>> drivers in /var....) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Right, but that wasn't my question, my question was will I be able to |
| 14 |
> continue using eudev (or mdev, or whatever)... |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Surely that depends on how well-maintained eudev remains in the future? |
| 19 |
And is therefore best answered by the package maintainers? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Like I said a little earlier, I really think your best bet is a udev |
| 22 |
fork (even if it's eudev) maintained with the same effort input as udev |
| 23 |
was before all this stuff started coming down the pipes. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
what I do know is that eudev is already lagging behind udev, most likely |
| 26 |
a symptom of limited time available from the maintainer. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 30 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives