1 |
On 2009-09-24, James Ausmus <james.ausmus@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com <paul.hartman%2Bgentoo@×××××.com>> wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> I think eSATA and SATA physically have different connectors, |
5 |
>> but they are the technically same (you can buy simple |
6 |
>> adapters...). |
7 |
|
8 |
They're compatible but not technically the same. The |
9 |
electrical specs for eSATA are stricter and provide more margin |
10 |
for noise and signal loss. I once used an internal-to-external |
11 |
adapter to connect an external drive to a normal motherboard |
12 |
SATA port. It worked most of the time, but there were |
13 |
occasional problems. [For all I know the same problems might |
14 |
have occurred if the drive was internal.] |
15 |
|
16 |
> I'm don't think that the connectors are different enough to |
17 |
> care about - I had (in a previous life/system) a PCI SATA |
18 |
> interface card that had both internal SATA and an eSATA |
19 |
> connector, and when I ran out of regular internal SATA |
20 |
> connectors, I just used a regular SATA cable, plugged into the |
21 |
> eSATA port, then ran the cable back in through an empty |
22 |
> expansion slot in the case, and hooked it up to a regular |
23 |
> internal SATA driver - worked like a champ... ;) |
24 |
|
25 |
The two connector types are supposed to be physically |
26 |
incompatible, but we'll take your word for it that you can make |
27 |
them mate. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Will the third world |
31 |
at war keep "Bosom Buddies" |
32 |
visi.com off the air? |