| 1 |
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:37:15 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > > It's because there's a /dev/dev folder |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Have you run rkhunter --update? I used to see this warning, but it |
| 6 |
> > disappeared a while ago with a database update. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I've just checked back and in my case it was /dev/md/n, which are links |
| 9 |
to /dev/mdn. I have no /dev/dev. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Actually I didn't think about an update, I updated right now and |
| 12 |
> rechecked, but nothing has changed. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Why do I have duplicated md devices? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
It sounds like a udev rule may be causing this, possibly an incorrectly |
| 17 |
written one, because the /dev part of node names is implicit in udev, so |
| 18 |
if you set a name or symlink to dev/foo, you'll get /dev/dev/foo. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Anyone able to feel pain is trainable. |
Archives