| 1 |
Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 01/08/13 19:28, Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Hi all, |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> Ok, rehashing this, but please don't turn it into another udev vs |
| 6 |
>> systemd thread. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> I have an older server that I have been putting off this update, |
| 9 |
>> debating on whether to update to the regular udev, or to eudev. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> I've googled until my fingers are blue, but cannot for the life of me |
| 12 |
>> find any explicit instructions for *how* to switch from udev to eudev. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> The eudev project page is sparse, to say the least. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> Anyone? |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> First of all, eudev only has IUSE="rule-generator" that is backported |
| 20 |
> from udev-171. |
| 21 |
> It's otherwise same in users point of view with sys-fs/udev, except |
| 22 |
> sys-fs/eudev is constantly out of date and the code forwarding from |
| 23 |
> upstream is not very reliable process. |
| 24 |
> Futhermore sys-fs/udev is not 'old' but it's the new one and will be |
| 25 |
> the default for OpenRC for long as OpenRC is in Portage. |
| 26 |
> I don't want to bash anything or anybody but sys-fs/eudev as-is in the |
| 27 |
> Portage is currently useless and a bit buggy. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
That's odd. I been using eudev since like the second version that came |
| 32 |
out and have had zero issues with it. Ask anyone here, if it had a |
| 33 |
problem, I'd be found it by now. lol |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Dale |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
:-) :-) |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives