Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Billy Wayne McCann <thebillywayne@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Seamonkey and saving images taking so long
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 03:34:27
Message-Id: 469AE603.2060501@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Seamonkey and saving images taking so long by Dale
1 Dale wrote:
2 > Well, I found out what was wrong with this thing. If you go to Tools >
3 > Download Manager and look in the window, there is a list of everything I
4 > have saved since I started using Seamonkey as my browser. That was a
5 > long time. I did a ctrl A to select all the downloads and then told it
6 > to remove them all from the list. This thing ran for 15 or 20 minutes
7 > at full throttle until I finally gave up and killed Seamonkey. I then
8 > went diggin in the .mozilla directory and found the file where all this
9 > is kept. I made a copy just in case then deleted the file completely.
10 > The file was HUGE. After I deleted that file I went back to some of the
11 > sites I got to and downloaded some images and then saved them. It was
12 > nice and fast again.
13 >
14 > So, the morale of this story is to delete all that crap in the download
15 > manager every once in a while before it gets to huge.
16 >
17 > Thanks Billy Wayne for helping me test this thing. It got me off to a
18 > new start.
19 >
20 > Dale
21 >
22 > :-) :-) :-)
23 >
24 > Hmmm, I wonder if this is a feature or a bug??
25
26 Hi Dale,
27
28 Glad I could be of some assistance. I had never tried Seamonkey before,
29 so this has given me opportunity to try it out. It'd be great if
30 Firefox plugins (or at least NoScript) worked within Seamonkey. I
31 rather like the "full-featuredness" of this app. I'll have to research.
32
33 In my opinion, it is difficult to imagine how what you've discovered
34 could be a feature. Also, it seems strange that simply having a
35 download history (even a large one) within Seamonkey's download manager
36 causes such an issue. I believe the standard protocol in such
37 situations is to install the seamonkey-bin to test whether or not the
38 -bin exhibits the same behaviour. If it doesn't, then it is a bug that
39 should be filed with Gentoo. If it does, then it is a bug that needs to
40 be filed with Mozilla. If this is inaccurate, I request correction, me
41 being a n00b and all. :)
42
43 Nice to meet you Dale. Happy Gentoo'ing.
44
45
46 Billy Wayne
47 --
48 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Seamonkey and saving images taking so long Dale <dalek1967@×××××××××.net>