Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: anti-portage wreckage?
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:57:26
Message-Id: 200701031351.17906.alan@linuxholdings.co.za
In Reply to: RE: [gentoo-user] Re: anti-portage wreckage? by "Nelson
1 On Wednesday 03 January 2007 13:03, Nelson, David (ED, PAR&D) wrote:
2 > Hi folks,
3 >
4 > Has the idea of distributing custom package.mask files occured?
5 > This way you can "mask off" certain versions of software and hence
6 > limit updates to minor changes. You can then use these on systems you
7 > want to keep as stable as possible, use a test machine to test
8 > changes to the package.mask and then roll it out. Might make
9 > management of many workstations/servers easier.
10 >
11 > Alternatively incorporating a custom package.mask into a custom boot
12 > CD could provide the basis of a Gentoo-derived custom distro?
13
14
15 portage already does this, in the profile. It's what defines
16 the 'system' package set.
17
18 For an example, look in the files
19 in /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2006.1/ - you can define USE
20 flags, required packages, versions of those packages, and basically
21 everything you mention above
22
23 alan
24
25 --
26 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list