1 |
On Monday 06 Aug 2012 12:25:19 Dale wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> What I have on there is videos. When I tried to compress some and test, |
4 |
> it was basically the same size. I guess videos don't compress to much? |
5 |
|
6 |
Not without transcoding the streams into more space efficient formats - but |
7 |
you could well suffer from loss of quality (lossy formats and digital |
8 |
generation losses). So YMMV. |
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
> While I am at it. You should have a good answer for this one. What is |
12 |
> a good file system for this sort of thing? I been using ext4 but it |
13 |
> sure does use a lot of space for its overhead. As far as files go, most |
14 |
> will likely be videos. I do have other files but when compared to the |
15 |
> number of videos, they are close to nothing. The files system for the |
16 |
> current 1Tb, spread across two drives with LVM, uses about 75Gbs for the |
17 |
> file system thingy. That's a pretty good bit to me. I may lose more |
18 |
> than 200Gbs on this 3Tb drive. O_O |
19 |
|
20 |
That sounds like a lot! I'm waiting to see what others comment and |
21 |
benchmarks. |
22 |
-- |
23 |
Regards, |
24 |
Mick |