1 |
Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> The problem is, if the hard drives fills up, most won't know that they |
4 |
>> can use LVM to expand it by adding a new drive. Since they don't know |
5 |
>> what LVM is, they don't know about the option they have and won't use it |
6 |
>> since they don't know it exists. |
7 |
> Honestly, I'm not sure how many of these users will be installing |
8 |
> Ubuntu in the first place. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> However, if they do use LVM and they end up asking somebody |
11 |
> knowledgeable for help, that person will be very happy to find that |
12 |
> the system has LVM installed. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> If there were some kind of trade-off I'd see the argument, but the |
15 |
> worst case here is just that they may or may not need it. For |
16 |
> something with some benefit and almost no drawback that seems like a |
17 |
> wrong reason to avoid LVM. |
18 |
> |
19 |
|
20 |
Even I've installed Ubuntu and friends for others in the past and it has |
21 |
LVM on it. Thing is, the person that actually uses the computer doesn't |
22 |
even know it exists. They also wouldn't know how to install Linux, of |
23 |
any flavor, or windoze either for that matter. Far to many only know |
24 |
how to push the button on the front to turn it on. |
25 |
|
26 |
Sure, it may help a very tiny percentage of people but I suspect it will |
27 |
be tiny. Mostly, for the same reasons I pointed out in another reply on |
28 |
this thread. |
29 |
|
30 |
Dale |
31 |
|
32 |
:-) :-) |