Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Stephane Pointu <stephane.pointu@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Odd portage behaviour with binary packages
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:22:03
Message-Id: 4534C9DB.6060907@purplelabs.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Odd portage behaviour with binary packages by Alan McKinnon
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Hi,
5
6 You didn't get my point. The global idea was that I thought that Portage
7 first checks ebuilds before installing any package, and as there was no
8 ebuild, the package shouldn't get installed. I did not know that there
9 was the ebuild in the package itself.
10
11 Stephane
12
13 Alan McKinnon wrote:
14 > On Tuesday 17 October 2006 11:44, Stephane Pointu wrote:
15 >> Hi all, I have a question about portage behaviour:
16 >>
17 >> I have a package built in a certain version in /usr/portage/package
18 >> but this version is not in portage tree (no ebuild for it). If I do a
19 >> "emerge -kuav world" it takes this package but if I do a "emerge -uav
20 >> world" it does not. Is this a normal behaviour? Shouldn't portage
21 >> first check if there is an ebuild for it before installing the
22 >> package?
23 >
24 > No, it makes perfect sense. When you use the -k switch, portage is in a
25 > position to find and use the prebuilt package, so it will.
26 >
27 > When you don't use the -k switch, it won't use /usr/portage/packages per
28 > the man page, so there's no sense in even attemtping to look for that
29 > package - as there is no ebuild for that version, it cannot possibly
30 > build it
31 >
32 > Your last question doesn't make sense - how can portage check for an
33 > ebuild that you earlier clearly said does not exist?
34 >
35 > alan
36 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
37 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
38 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
39
40 iD8DBQFFNMnbWWLMt96bzSoRAjLXAKCMyIind950O8x+r/zqJ3oj2cqXdgCgnenu
41 ImG22gm7zhrCSTrk8BjVvos=
42 =zu0Y
43 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
44 --
45 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list