Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] OpenRC broke my LVM? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:34:39 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20080423153431.16a630cd@loonquawl.digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] OpenRC broke my LVM? by Matt Harrison |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:20:00 +0100, Matt Harrison wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > I've tried to upgrade to BL2, and found it is masked, along with |
| 4 | > openrc...so if those were masked..how did I end up with bits that rely |
| 5 | > on it, without unmasking them? strange. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Very strange. Baselayout-2 and openrc are both keyword masked and |
| 9 | shouldn't be installed on a stable system. Which bits of |
| 10 | testing/bl2/openrc have you ended up with? |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Neil Bothwick |
| 15 | |
| 16 | In space, no one can hear you fart. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] OpenRC broke my LVM? | Matt Harrison <iwasinnamuknow@×××××××××.com> |